AI is no longer an experiment; it’s driving strategic business decisions. While technology leaders focus on implementation, HR often gets left out of conversations about how to use AI strategically. Yet HR is vital to ensuring that high-touch work stays human-led—shaping culture, coaching future leaders and making sure AI insights meet real employee needs.
According to SHRM, just 26% of surveyed HR professionals are involved in managing AI adoption. Yet two-thirds believe HR should play a larger role in assessing readiness and defining objectives.
Why the cold shoulder about AI?
Companies often treat AI as a technology rollout led by the CIO, with oversight from finance. But transformation isn’t just implementation; it’s about aligning strategy, culture and people.
It means asking:
- What AI use cases support our business strategy?
- How do we share the vision across all levels?
- How will implementation impact the workforce?
- What skills do employees need, and how will we upskill?
- Will roles change? If so, how?
- How do we measure performance in ways that account for AI’s influence, through ongoing enablement and not backward-looking reviews?
Without HR, these questions go unanswered. According to Gartner, 62% of CEOs believe AI will define the next business era, but only 21% of CIOs say their organizations prioritize mitigating AI’s workforce impact.
HR leaders understand how new tools such as AI impact workforce dynamics, for better or worse. They can use workforce insights to align talent strategies with both the company’s reputation as an employer of choice and its broader business objectives.
Compared to IT leaders, HR has the workforce insight needed to align AI with both culture and business goals. HR can embed AI into modern performance enablement systems—where continuous goals, regular feedback, and recognition drive trust and fairness—instead of propping up outdated annual reviews.
AI can accelerate feedback, recognition and goal alignment. But without HR’s oversight, the company risks reinforcing outdated annual review cycles instead of enabling continuous, fair conversations that actually improve outcomes and reflect an AI + human workforce. Excluding HR also undermines adoption and communication, leading to a misaligned workforce and competitive disadvantages. The future isn’t “AI vs. humans.” It’s HR guiding the partnership, so technology enhances what makes us human.
HR involvement can drive tool usage
Resistance to and fear of AI tools are becoming less of a concern as adoption increases and they further integrate into professional and personal life. However, employees are often not using AI to the extent their employers feel they should. Leadership views AI as strategic, but staff are less aligned and may be more hesitant. Bridging this gap between leadership’s vision and employees’ actual AI usage is where HR comes in.
HR plays an important role in communication, hands-on training and AI support to ensure employees can align their usage with leadership’s strategic vision for an AI-enhanced workforce.
The most significant risks come when AI adoption is fragmented, inequitable and misaligned with leadership’s workforce priorities. Without HR, these risks include:
- No readiness assessment or change support
- Delayed reskilling
- Performance evaluations based on outcomes without clarity on AI’s role
- Weak governance and reactive ethics handling
Without HR at the center of AI adoption, organizations might erode employees’ trust and the long-term value of their investments.
HR as the guardian of ethical AI in the workplace
Beyond promoting adoption, HR also plays a key role in ethical AI use. HR leaders manage the intersection of work, people and their company’s values and identity. They are well-suited to ensure that trust and equity in AI adoption fit with the company’s past practices and future plans. Best practices include:
- Creating internal AI ethics boards
- Requiring explainability for AI-driven recommendations
- Offering transparency to employees whose performance is augmented by AI
- Evaluating AI not only for technical accuracy, but for equity and employee impact
AI in hiring, promotions and performance evaluations affects real careers and lives. That makes HR’s role non-negotiable: to keep these processes transparent, fair, and human-led. Without oversight, AI can reinforce bias and erode trust. With HR at the center, AI becomes a tool for enablement, not exclusion. HR can ensure fairness by:
- Defining clear boundaries: AI can inform decisions (e.g., suggest candidates or summarize feedback), but managers lead the conversations and final calls.
- Demanding explainability from vendors — how models reach their recommendations.
- Continuously testing for bias across race, gender, age, and other categories.
- Training leaders to use AI insights as input for performance reviews and talent conversations—augmentation, not abdication.
- Establishing review boards of HR, IT and DEI leaders to evaluate employment-related AI systems.
Framed this way, AI doesn’t replace human judgment. It strengthens continuous performance practices by giving managers richer insights for ongoing goals, feedback, and recognition. Done right, AI supports transparency and trust — the foundations of true performance enablement.
CHROs: guiding culture, strategy and AI together
Are CHROs ready to take a larger role in AI adoption and usage? They’re ideally suited to the job. Their role is at the intersection of culture, people and strategy. When HR leads AI adoption through the lens of continuous performance enablement, technology becomes a tool that strengthens trust, fairness, and alignment—not one that erodes them. That’s the opportunity before CHROs: to ensure AI enhances performance by keeping people at the center.
Source – https://hrexecutive.com/why-leaving-hr-out-of-ai-decisions-is-a-strategic-mistake/