In a post that has now gone viral on Reddit’s r/antiwork community, a warehouse employee’s account of being officially reprimanded for “not smiling enough” has left the internet both baffled and furious. The anonymous user, who identifies as a picker working grueling 10-hour shifts in a windowless warehouse, shared the surreal experience of being pulled aside by a supervisor and handed a write-up for what was described as a poor attitude.
The post reads, “I asked what it was for, he said: ‘Your attitude. You don’t smile or seem approachable.’” The employee emphasized that their role involves little to no interaction with others and that productivity had not been questioned. “I work 10-hour shifts moving heavy boxes in a windowless building where we’re not allowed to have earbuds, take phone calls, or speak unless it’s job-related,” they wrote. “Smile for who? The boxes?”
The write-up that launched a fiery comments
The post quickly gained traction with thousands of comments, many accusing the supervisor of weaponizing workplace morale as a vague and subjective criterion. “So now I guess I’m supposed to beam like a Disney mascot while hauling pallets in steel-toed boots for $16 an hour?” the user wrote, encapsulating what many saw as the absurdity of the situation.
Other Redditors chimed in with biting sarcasm and mock suggestions. One commenter encouraged the worker to request a formal HR meeting, complete with a smiling improvement plan, periodic check-ins, and “mentorship from employees who smile correctly.” Another wrote, “Definitely give him the creepiest dead-eyed smile every time you see him from now on,” echoing a sentiment of sarcastic resistance.
Sexism and silent expectations in the workplace
Several users speculated that the situation could be tied to gender-based discrimination, with one commenter asking bluntly, “Are you a woman? If so, I’d honestly go to HR and ask if there is a ‘women must smile’ policy in the handbook.” Others shared personal experiences of being told to smile in male-dominated environments like construction sites, where such expectations are rarely placed on men.
One particularly poignant comment read, “The sexual harassment I witnessed on a daily basis went completely ignored by management/HR. And when the female employees would speak up or clap back, they got labeled as rude or difficult to work with, or bad for morale.” For many, the post has become a microcosm of how gendered double standards and unrealistic emotional labor are quietly enforced in blue-collar jobs.
A question of morale or management control?
The write-up has also sparked a broader debate around what workplace morale actually means and whether it can—or should—be tied to outward expressions like smiling. While it’s true that positivity can be infectious, commenters argue that in physically demanding environments with minimal human interaction, forcing emotional expressions becomes performative, even punitive.
The story, first shared on Reddit, has now sparked interest across platforms and discussions around labor rights, especially in environments where conditions are already harsh and pay is low. Many are calling for better training for supervisors and more stringent policies around what constitutes acceptable grounds for disciplinary action.
As one user put it: “They want to fire you, they are just starting a paper trail. Make sure you get a copy of this for the eventual unemployment case.”
In the age of AI productivity tools and mental health awareness, the idea that warehouse workers must also perform joy on demand seems increasingly dystopian. Whether this incident was a one-off or indicative of a larger workplace culture problem, the internet has made one thing clear—people are done being told to smile for minimum wage.